- #Html accessibility screen reader how to#
- #Html accessibility screen reader android#
- #Html accessibility screen reader code#
#Html accessibility screen reader how to#
Part of creating an accessible user experience means learning how to make the most of semantic HTML. Moreover, it uses the right HTML elements for the task at hand, rather than trying to force an element into a different role. Semantic HTML conveys meaning and content organization to both sighted and blind users. This means that they may be inadvertently violating certain best practices that exist to help us create a more accessible user experience on the web. Developers tend to design a user experience with sighted users in mind, forgetting about users who rely on screen readers. Hope this is helpful! Any views & opinions can be shared in comments section.Accessibility is a hot topic in front-end development, but it’s not always executed correctly, even on some of the world’s most popular apps and websites. If something doesn’t work, then cross testing on a different browser/platform can determine if it is a browser or screen reader bug. Most of the HTML5 & WAI-ARIA attributes are supported on all these platforms.
#Html accessibility screen reader code#
If you have written a clean code that is semantic & follows all W3C Standards then testing on these platforms will suffice. So let’s answer the question, which screen reader should I use for accessibility testing? In my opinion & my experience, this is the matrix that I have come up with and now for your view: Secondly, testing with all browsers VS screen readers is a costly affair as it consumes a lot of resources, time and money too. Not every attribute is supported by all the screen readers. The same is true when we talk of the screen readers too. Firstly, the support for HTML attributes and ARIA attributes by the browser vendors vary a lot. Even according to NVAccess, creators of NVDA the best browser that NVDA supports is Firefox.īesides, there are other factors too that attribute to the AT testing conundrum. Screen Reader & BrowserĪt my work place we follow testing on Firefox with NVDA screen reader & if we encounter any bugs related to either screen reader or the browser, we immediately raise the bugs with the vendor. During my day to day accessibility testing I use NVDA with Firefox & sometimes I also use NVDA with Chrome to see if any ARIA or HTML5 attribute is not being supported by the browser or the screen reader. I personally prefer JAWS with Internet Explorer & JAWS with Chrome as the new version of Firefox doesn’t work with JAWS yet. BrowserĪccording to WebAIM Screen reader survey we can clearly see from the below table that JAWS works great on Internet Explorer followed by NVDA with Firefox.
#Html accessibility screen reader android#
When it comes to IOS & OSx Safari is the most popular browser & on Android Chrome & Firefox both hold a good position. Definitely assistive technology users prefer Firefox over Chrome for their day to day activities. But according to WebAIM screen reader survey7 conducted in 2017, Firefox stands first followed by internet Explorer & in 3rd place is Chrome. These stats are true for both desktop & mobile. Popular BrowsersĪccording to Wikipedia, chrome holds the majority share for the browser market followed by Safari. Testing with every screen reader on every browser is not feasible if not impossible. Whenever I say that I make web & mobile Apps accessible for the disability groups, the first question some of the educated developers who understand accessibility ask me is, what browsers you test your APP’s on & which screen readers do you use? This is a very interesting question because, there are a wide variety of browsers & screen readers that are available in the market.